Oedipus against the grain

Authors

  • Luiz Meyer

Keywords:

Oedipus complex, Aesthetic conflict, Generalized seduction, L, H, K Emotional bonds, Filicide, Primary violence

Abstract

The author examines the trajectory of Oedipus according to Sophocles' tragedy, focusing on the suffering that was originally inflicted on him, prior to his return to Thebes. From a poem he wrote entitled “Against the Grain” he gives voice to the suffering, and wronged Oedipus who returns to ostensibly show the population of Polis, through his swollen ankles, the torture he suffered at birth at the hands of Laius and Jocasta.  In parallel to this voice, we hear another that comments on Oedipus' behavior from the perspective of various psychoanalytic theories supported by Freud, Bion, Melanie Klein, Laplanche, Meltzer and Ferenczi. The article emphasizes how much Oedipus lacked primary love experiences and how this deprivation left deep marks on his character and conduct. In the text, Laius' murder is presented as deserved revenge together with the accusation against the people of Thebes of collusion with their criminal fathers. This lends the work a political-social denunciation character absent in the original. This Oedipus goes against the grain in that it proposes to address Oedipus the subject and not Oedipus the king and consequently Oedipus the victim rather than the arrogant and triumphant hero guilty of incest and patricide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luiz Meyer

Membro Efetivo da Sociedade Brasileira de Psicanálise de São Paulo (SBPSP).

References

Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Tavistock.

Bion, W. R. (1962). Learing from experience. London: William Heinemann.

Ferenczi, S. (1992). Confusão de língua entre os adultos e a criança: 1933 - a linguagem da ternura e da paixão. In S. Ferenczi. Psicanálise 4 (Vol. 4, pp. 97-106). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

Homero (1981). Odisseia. (Tradução de A. P. de Carvalho). São Paulo: Abril Cultural.

Homero (1992). Odisseia. (Tradução de M. O. Mendes). São Paulo: Edusp.

Homero (2014). Odisseia. (Tradução de C. Werner). São Paulo: Cosac Naify.

Klein, M. (1957). Envy and gratitude: a study of unconscious sources. London: Tavistock.

Klein, M. (1991). Inveja e gratidão e outros trabalhos: 1946-1963 (Vol. 3). Rio de Janeiro: Imago.

Laplanche, J. (1968). Da teoria da sedução restrita à teoria da sedução generalizada. In J. Laplanche. Teoria da sedução generalizada e outros ensaios (pp. 108-25). Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.

Laplanche, J. (2008). A partir da situação antropológica fundamental. In Laplanche, J. Sexual: a sexualidade ampliada no sentido freudiano. Porto Alegre: Dublinense.

Meltzer, D. (1967). The psycho-analytical process. London: William Heinemann Medical Books.

Meltzer, D., & Williams, M. H. (1988). The apprehension of beauty: the role of aesthetic conflict in development, violence and art. Pertshire: Clunie Press.

Meyer, L. (2010). Réu confesso- poemas reunidos (1968-2010). São Paulo: Ateliê Editorial.

Meyer, L. (2022). Sujando o ninho e outros poemas. São Paulo: Editora Iluminas.

Sófocles (1990). Édipo rei. (Tradução de M. G. Kury). Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.

Sófocles (2009). Édipo rei. (Tradução de T. Vieira). São Paulo: Perspectiva.

Sófocles (2018). Édipo tirano. (Tradução de L. Antunes). São Paulo: Todavia.

Steiner, J. (2018). The trauma and disillusionment of Oedipus. Int. J. Psycho-Anal, 99(3), 555-568.

Tarelho, L. C. (2012). A teoria da sedução generalizada de Jean Laplanche e o descentramento do ser humano. Jornal de Psicanálise, 45(83), 97-108.

Published

2024-06-10

How to Cite

Meyer, L. (2024). Oedipus against the grain. SPPA Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31(2). Retrieved from https://revista.sppa.org.br/RPdaSPPA/article/view/1202