O conceito de processo analítico e o trabalho de transformação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/sppa%20revista.v11i2.653Keywords:
Processo analítico, Trabalho de transformação, Teorias implícitas, Modelo imaginário, Modelo teóricoAbstract
Neste trabalho, debruço-me principalmente sobre duas teses: o conceito de processo analítico e o trabalho de transformação que nele ocorre. No
que diz respeito a este último, trato de um dos elementos que contribuem para tornar a transformação possível: refiro-me especificamente à construção, na mente do analista, de segmentos de teoria no trabalho clínico. Proponho também algumas breves reflexões sobre o conceito e o emprego dos modelos na teoria e na prática analíticas, destacando a diferença entre modelo imaginário e modelo teórico, diferença esta que tem, a meu ver, uma grande importância para a psicanálise. O haikai dos instrumentos conceituais do processo é uma lista das contribuições pós-freudianas que me parecem mais úteis e mais próximas de minha concepção pessoal do processo psicanalítico. Defendo uma definição do processo psicanalítico que privilegia o processo a partir de algo, em vez de dar ênfase ao processo em direção a algo, e que considera o processo como um postulado essencial para que a experiência de transformação e de mudança ocorra na análise (AU)
Downloads
References
ABEND, S. (1990). The psychoanalytic process: motives and obstacles in the search for clarification.
Psychoanalytic Quarterly, v. 59, p.532-549.
AMATI MEHLER, J.; ARGENTIERI, S.; CANESTRI, J. (1990). La Babel de l’inconscient. Langue
maternelle, langues étrangères et psychanalyse. Paris: PUF, 1994.
ARAKIDA MORITAKÉ. (1910). Haikai., p.383, In: REVON, M. Anthologie de la littérature
japonaise. Paris: Librairie Ch. Delagrave.
ARGENTIERI, S. (2000). La sindrome di Dédalo. In: Le vertigini del labirinto, a cura di Raffaele
Aragona. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, p.65-71.
ARLOW, J.; BRENNER, C. (1990). The psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, v. 59,
p.678-692.
AULAGNIER, P. (1975). La violence de l’interprétation. Paris: PUF.
BACHELARD, G. (1934). Le nouvel esprit identifique. Paris: PUF.
BADIOU, A. (1969). Le concept de modèle. Paris: François Maspero.
BARANDE, R. (1979). Transmission ou processus? Revue Française Psychanalyse, v. 43, p.211-221.
______. (1991). Non seulement – mais encore. Revue Française Psychanalyse, v. 55, p.453-463.
BARANGER, M.; BARANGER, W. (1961). La situazione analitica come campo dinamico. In: La situazione psicoanalitica come campo bipersonale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore. pp: 27-71.
BARANGER, M.; BARANGER, W.; MOM, J. (1983). Processus et non-processus dans le travail
analytique. Revue Française Psychanalyse, v. 47, p.1223-1242.
BELLONE, E. (2003). La stella nuova. L’evoluzione e il caso Galilei. Torino: Einaudi.
BENTHAM, J. (1813, 1814,1821). De l’ontologie et autres textes sur les fictions. Paris: Seuil,
BIBRING, E. (1937). Symposium on the theory of the therapeutic results of psycho-analysis.
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 18, p.164-183.
BICCHIERI, C. (1980). Introduzione. In: HESSE, M. Modelli e analogie nella scienza. Milano:
Feltrinelli, p.7-46.
BION, W.R. (1962). Aux sources de l’expérience. Paris: PUF, 1979.
______. (1965). Transformations. Paris: PUF, 1982.
______. (1970). Attention and interpretation. A scientific approach to insight in psycho-analysis
and groups. Tavistok: Londres.
______. (1992). Cogitations. London: Karnac Books.
BITBOL, M. (1997). Mécanique quantique. Une introduction philosophique. Paris: Flammarion.
______. (1998). L’aveuglante proximité du réel. Paris: Flammarion.
BOESKY, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, v.
, p.550-586.
BORGES, J.L. (1944). El jardín de los senderos que se bifurcan. In : Obras Completas. Globo :São
Paulo, 1999, p.472-480.
BOTELLA, C. et BOTELLA, S. (2001). Figurabilité et régrédience. Revue Française Psychanalyse,
v. 65, p.1149-1239.
BRITTON, R. (1998). Belief and imagination. Explorations in Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
CACCIAVILLANI, G. (2003). Vademecum Bion. Firenze: Nicomp.
CANESTRI, J. (1986). La fantasia scientifica: una nota di lettura sulla «Sintesi delle nevrosi di
traslazione» di S. Freud. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, v. 32, p.591-602.
______. (1991). La passione della língua originaria nella letteratura e nella psicoanalisi: il piccolo
Hans. Milano: Media Press.
______. (1993a). The logic of freudian research. In: MEGHNAGI, D. Freud and Judaism. London:
Karnac Books, p.117-129.
______. (1993b). Il soggetto polilogico. In: Ri-scritture. Roma: Centro Romano di Semiótica, Eurelle
Edizioni, p.25-32.
______. (1994a). From internal flux to shared experience. In: The analyst mind: from listening to
interpretation. London: IPA, p.23-30.
______. (1994b). Transformations. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 75, p.1079-1092.
______. (1995). Einige überlegungen zur supervision in der psychoanalytischen Ausbildung. In:
Hundert jahre psychoanalytische methode. Wiesbaden, Deutsche Psychoanalytische
Vereinigung, p.239-263.
______. (1999a). Development of affect in bilingual patients. International Psychoanalytical
Congress. Santiago de Chile: IPA.
______. (1999b). Alcune note e un esempio su attività linguistica e psicoanalisi. Psicoanalisi, v. 3,
p.68-82.
______. (1999c). Psychoanalytic heuristics. In: Psychoanalysis on the move. The Work Joseph Sandler.
London: Routledge, p.201-216.
______. (2000). Notes on linguistic activity and psychoanalysis. In: Changing ideas in a changing
world. The revolution in psychoanalysis. London: Karnac, p.197-205.
______. (2001). Ferenczi e l’attività linguistica nell’analisi. In: La catástrofe e i suoi simboli. Torino:
UTET, p.187-197.
______. (2002a). Trois, le nombre magique: Green avec Peirce. In: Penser les limites. Écrits en
l’honneur d’André Green. Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé, p.531-538.
______. (2002b). On the contribution of the most recent research on language applied to psychoanalytic
practice, with regard to regional differences. International Symposium: Psjchoanalysis as an
Empirical, Interdisciplinary Science. Wien, Austrian Accademy of Sciences, (à paraitre).
______. (2003a). The logic of psychoanalytic research. In: BOHLEBER, M. L.; DREHER, A. M.;
CANESTRI, J. (editors). Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis. London:
International Psychoanalytic Library, p.137-148..
______. (2003b). Implicit understanding of clinical material beyond theory. Fédération européenne
de psychanalyse. Bulletin spécial à paraître.
CHANDRASEKHAR, S. (1990). Verità e bellezza, Milano: Garzanti.
COMPTON, A. (1990). Psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, v. 59, p.585-598.
CORTI, M. (1993). Percorsi dell’invenzione. Il linguaggio poetico e Dante. Torino: Einaudi.
CULIOLI, A. (1990). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Paris: Ophrys.
DANON-BOILEAU, L. (1987). Le sujet de l’enonciation. Psychanalyse et linguistique. Paris: Ophrys.
DONNET, J.L. (2001). De Ia règle fondamentale à Ia situation analysante. Revue Française
Psychanalyse, v. 65, p.243-257.
DREHER, Á.U. (2000). Foundations for conceptual research in psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
DUCROT, O. (1984). Le dire et le dit. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
DUHEM, P. (1906). La théorie physique: son objet, sa structure (La teoria fisica). Bologna: Il
Mulino, 1978.
ETCHEGOYEN, H. (1986). Los fundamentos de Ia técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
EVERETT, H. (1957). Relative state formulation of Quantic Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics,
v.29 (454:462), 1957.
FAIN, M. (1969). Ébauche d’une recherche concernant l’existence d’activités mentales pouvant
être considérées come prototipiques du processus psychanalytique. Revue Française
Psychanalyse, v. 33, p.5-6.
FREUD, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment (further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis.
S.E. vol. XII.
______. (1915). Uebersicht der Uebertragungsneurosen. Frankfurt am Main, S. Fischer Verlag.
______. (1916-17). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. SE vol. XVI.
______. (1933). Sándor Ferenczi, S.E. vol XXII.
GALATZER-LEVY, R.M. (1995). Psychoanalysis and dynamical systems theory: prediction and
self-similarity. Journal of American Psychoanalytical Association, v. 43, p.1085-1113.
GIORELLO, G. (1976). Introduzione. In: LAKATOS, I. Proofs and refutations: the logic of
mathematical discovery. Milano: Feltrinelli, p.7-33.
______. (1990). Introduzione. In: HADAMARD, J. The psychology of invention in the mathematical
field. [1945], 1990. p.7-17. Milano, Raffaello Cortina.
GREEN, A. (1973). Le discours vivant. Paris: PUF.
______. (1984). Le langage dans Ia psychanalyse. In: Langages. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, p.19-250.
______. (1993). Le travail du négatif, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
______. (2000). Le temps éclaté. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
______. (2001). Mythes et réalités sur le processus psychanalytique: I et II. Revue Française
Psychosomatique, 20, p.19-20.
______. (2002). Idées directrices pour une psychanalyse contemporaine, Paris: PUF.
GREENACRE, P. (1968). The psychoanalytic process, transference, and acting out. International
Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 49, p.211-218.
GRICE, H. Logics and Semantics. In: Cole, P.; Morgan, J. Syntax and Semantics. Academic Press:New
York, 1975.
GRUBRICH-SIMITIS, I. (1985). Metapsychologie und Metabiologie. Zu Sigmund Freuds Entwurf
einer. Uebersicht der Uebertragungsneurosen. In: Freud, S. Uebersicht der
Uebertragungsneurosen. Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag. p.85-119.
______. (1986). Six Ietters of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi on the interrelationship of
psychoanalytic theory and technique. International Review Psychoanalysis, v. 13, p.259-277.
GUTTMAN, S. et al. (editors) (1980). Concordance to the psychological works of S. Freud. Boston:
G. K. Hall.
HADAMARD, J. [1945] (1990). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton
University Press.
HEIMANN, P. (1950). On counter-transference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 31,
p.81-84.
HEISENBERG, W. (1942). Les différents régions de réalité. In: Le manuscrit de 1942. Paris: Allia,
, p.8-13.
HESSE, M. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: University Notre Dame Press.
KLIMOVSKY, G. (1982). Concepto de proceso. Revista del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires.
Suplemento Psicopatologico, 20, p.7-10.
KÖHLER, W. ([1930] 1962) . Psychologie de la forme. Paris, Gallimard.
KUHN, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago.
______. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago.
LACAN, J. (1958). La direction de Ia cure et les principes de son pouvoir. In: Ecrits. Paris: Seuil,
, p.585-645.
LAKATOS, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: the logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
LECHARTIER, C.; POLLAK-CORNILLOT, M.; VALANTIN, S.; de VITRY, H. (1991). Revue
critique. Le processus psychanalytique. Revue Française Psychanalyse, v. 2, p.511-521.
LEWIN, K. (1926). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
LEVI-STRAUSS, C. (1983). Le regard éloigné. Paris: Plon.
MELTZER, D. (1967). Le processus psychanalytique. Paris: Payot, 1971.
MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de Ia perception. Paris: Gallimard.
______. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
MICHELS, R. (1994). Validation in the clinical process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis,
v. 75, p.1133-1140.
MORAN, M. G. (1991). Chaos theory and psychoanalysis: the fluidistic nature of the mind.
International Review of Psychoanalysis, v. 18, p.211-221.
PEIRCE, C.S. (1931-1958). Collected papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
PENROSE, R. (1997). The large, the small and the human mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
PERRON, R. (1991). Des divers sens du terme “modèle” et de leurs usages possibles en psychanalyse.
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 55, p.221-232.
PICHON-RIVIÈRE. E. El processo grupal. Nueva Visión:Buenos Aires, 1980.
PLANCK, M. (1935). Die Physik im Kampf um die Weltanschauung. Conference.
POINCARÉ, H. (1908). Science et méthode, Paris: Flammarion.
POLANYI, M. (1960). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
______. (1958). La conoscenza personale. Milano: Rusconi, 1990.
POPPER, K. [1934] (1959). La Iogique de Ia découverte scientifique. Paris: Payot, 1982.
______. (1972). La connaissance objective. Paris: Flammarion, 1999.
PRAGIER, G.; FAURC-PRAGIER, S. (1990). Un siècle après l’Esquisse: nouvelles métaphores?
Métaphores du nouveau? Revue Française Psychanalyse, v. 54, p.1395-1529.
QUINODOZ, J.M. (1997). Transitions in psychic structures in the light of deterministic chaos theory.
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 78, p.699-718.
RAPAPORT, D., GILL, M. (1959). The points of view and assumptions of metapsychology.
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 40, p.153-162.
ROSENSTIEHL, P. (1979). Labirinto. Enciclopedia, vol. ottavo. Labirinto-Memoria. Torino: Einaudi.
SANDLER, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and
psychoanalytic practice. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 64, 35-45.
SANDLER, J.; SANDLER, A.M. (1983). The “second censorship”, the “three box model” and
some technical implicarions. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, v. 64, p.413-425.
SAUGUET, H. (1969). Introduction à une discussion sur le processus psychanalytique. Revue
Française Psychanalyse, v. 33, p.913-927.
SHIMONY, A. (1997). Sur le mental, Ia mécanique quantique et Ia manifestation des potentialités.
In: PENROSE, R. The large, the small and the human mind. p.163-178. Paris: Flammarion.
SMITH, H. F. (2002). Panel report on “Creating the psychoanalytical process”. International Journal
of Psychoanalysis, v. 83, p.211-227.
SPRUIELL, V. (1993). Deterministic chaos and the sciences of complexity: psychoanalysis in the
midst of a general scientific revolution. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, v.
, p.3-44.
STEINER, J. (1993). Retraits psychiques. Paris: PUF, 1996.
TEGMARK, M. (2003). Universi paralleli. Le Scienze, édition italienne de Scientific American, n.
, p.54-65.
VAIHINGER, H. (1922). Die philosophie des als ob. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.
VYGOTSKI, L.S. (1934). Pensée et langage. Paris: Scan d’éditions, 1962.
WEINSHEL, E. (1984). Some observations on the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quaterly,
v. 53, p.63-92.
WEINSHEL E. (1990). Further observadons on the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Quaterly,
v. 59, 629-649.
WINNICOTT, D.W. (1969). Jeu et réalité. Paris: Gallimard, 1971.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1953). Remarques philosophiques. Paris: Gallimard, 1984.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Atribuo os direitos autorais que pertencem a mim, sobre o presente trabalho, à SPPA, que poderá utilizá-lo e publicá-lo pelos meios que julgar apropriados, inclusive na Internet ou em qualquer outro processamento de computador.
I attribute the copyrights that belong to me, on this work, to SPPA, which may use and publish it by the means it deems appropriate, including on the Internet or in any other computer processing.
Atribuyo los derechos de autor que me pertenecen, sobre este trabajo, a SPPA, que podrá utilizarlo y publicarlo por los medios que considere oportunos, incluso en Internet o en cualquier otro tratamiento informático.
