Projective identification and the third subjugator

Authors

  • Thomas Ogden American Psychoanalytic Association (APA)

Keywords:

Projective identification, third subjugator, schizophrenia, Interpretation, Psychoanalytic technique

Abstract

In this work, the nature of the interaction of subjectivity and intersubjectivity, specific to projective identification, is discussed. In projective identification there is a partial collapse of the dialectical movement of individual subjectivity and intersubjectivity, and the result is the creation of a subjugating analytical third (within which the individual subjectivities of the participants are largely subsumed). A successful analytical process involves the overcoming of the third, and the reappropriation of (transformed) subjectivities by the participants as separate (and yet interdependent) individuals. This is achieved through an act of mutual recognition that is often mediated by the analyst's interpretation of transference and countertransference, and the analysand's use of the analyst's interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Thomas Ogden, American Psychoanalytic Association (APA)

Psychiatrist and psychoanalyst affiliated with the American Psychoanalytic Association and the International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA)

References

BION, W.R. (1952). Group dynamics: a review. In Experiences in Group. New York: Basic Books, 1959, pp. 141 192.

BION, W.R. (1959). Attack on linking. Int. J. PsychoanaL, 40: 308 315.

BION, W.R. (1962) Leaming from Experience. London: Tavistock.

GROTSTEIN, J. (1981). Splitting and Projective ldentification. New York: Jason Aronson. JOSEPH, B. (1987). Projective identification: some clinical aspects. In Melanie Klein Today, Volume 1: Mainly Theory. New York: Routledge, 1988, pp. 138 150.

HEGEL, G. W. F. (1807). PhenomenologyofSpirit. A. B. Miller, trans. London: Oxford University Press, 1977.

KERNBERG, O. (1987). Projection, projective identification: developmental, clinical. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assn., 35: 795 820.

KLEIN, M. (1946). Notes of some schizoid mechanisms. In Envy and Gratitude and Other Works, 1946 1963. New York: Delacorte, 1975, pp. 1 24.

KLEIN, M. (1955).Onidentification. In EnvyandGratitudeandOtherWorks, 1946 1963.NewYork: Delacorte, 1975, pp. 141 175.

KOJÈVE, A. (1934 1935). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. J. H. Nichols, trans. Ithaca:Cornell University Press, 1969.

MELTZER, D. (1966). The relation of anal masturbation to projective identification. Int. J. PsychoanaL, 47: 335 342.

MELTZER, D. (1978). The Kleinian Development. Part III. The Clinical Significance of the Work of Bion. Perthshire, Scothland: Clunie Press.

OGDEN, T.H. (1978a). A development view of identifications resulting from maternal impinge ments. Int J. PsychoanaL Psychother., 7: 486 507.

OGDEN, T.H. (1978b). A reply Dr. Omston's discussion of "A developmental view of identifications resulting from maternal impingements". Int. J PsychoanaL Psychother, 7: 528 532.

OGDEN, T.H. (1979). On projective identification. Int. J. PsychoanaL, 60: 357 373.

OGDEN, T.H. (1980). On nature of schizophrenic conflict. Int. J. PsychoanaL, 61: 513 533.

OGDEN, T.H. (1981). Projective identification and psychiatric hospital treatment. Buli. Menn. Clin., 45:317 333.

OGDEN, T.H. (1978a) Projective Identification and Psychotherapeutic Technique. New York: Jason Aronson.

OGDEN, T.H. (1982b). Treatment of the schizophrenic state of non experience. In Technical Factors in the Treatmentof the SeverelyDisturbed Patient. L. B. Boyer and P. L. Giovacchini, eds. New York: Jason Aronson, pp. 217 260.

OGDEN, T.H. (1984). Instinct, phantasy and psychological deep structure: a reinterpretation of aspects of the work of Melanie Klein. Contemp. PsychoanaL, 20: 500 525.

OGDEN, T.H. (1985). The potential space. Int. J. PsychoanaL, 66: 129 141.

OGDEN, T.H. (1986). The Matrix of the Mind.. Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

OGDEN, T.H. (1988). On dialectical structure of experience: some clinical and theoretical implications. Contemp. PsychoanaL, 24:17 45.

OGDEN, T.H. (1989). The Primitive Edge of Experience. Northvale, N. J.: Jason Aronson.

OGDEN, T.H. (1992). On the dialectically constituted/decentred subject of psychoanalysis. II. The contribution of Klein and Winnicott. Int J. PsychoanaL, 73: 613 626.

OGDEN, T.H. (1994a). The analytic third working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int. J. PsychoanaL, vol. 75, Part 1, in press.

OGDEN, T.H. (1994b). The concept of interpretive action. Psychoanalytic Quartedy, vol. 63, Part 2, in press.

O'SHAUGHNESSY, E. (1983). Words and working through. Int. J. PsychoanaL, 64:281 290.

PICK, I (1985). Working through in the counter transference. In Melanie Klein Today, Volume 2: Mainly Practice. E. Spillius, ed. London: Routledge, 1988, pp. 34 47.

ROSENFELD, H. (1952(. Notes on the psychoanalysis of the superego conflict of an acute schizophrenic patient. Int. J. PsychoanaL, 33: 11 131.

ROSENFELD, H. (1971). Contribution to the psychopathology of psychotic states: the importance of projective identification in the ego structure and the object relations of the psychotic patients. In Problems of Psychosis. P. Doucet and C. Laurin, eds. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, pp. 115 128.

ROSENFELD, H. (1987). Impasse and Interpretation. London: Tavistock.

SEGAL, H. (1981). The Work of Hanna Segal: A Kleinian Approach to Clinical Practice. New York: Jason Aronson.

Published

1994-08-07

How to Cite

Ogden, T. (1994). Projective identification and the third subjugator. SPPA Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1(2), 153–162. Retrieved from https://revista.sppa.org.br/RPdaSPPA/article/view/1007

Issue

Section

Artigos