O estudo de caso como metodologia de investigação psicanalítica
Palavras-chave:
estudo de caso, hermenêutica, métodos qualitativos, contratransferência, inconsciente.Resumo
Registam-se divergências epistemológicas relativas ao estudo de caso como método adequado à validação da teoria psicanalítica entre uma posição que compreende a investigação psicanalítica como o estudo dos significados e método apropriado à investigação das teorias psicanalíticas e uma abordagem que privilegia a adopção dum caráter científico, baseando-se na integração de metodologias de investigação apoiada em lógicas de relações probabilísticas de causalidade. A investigação psicanalítica, de acordo com modelos de causalidade, parece não considerar a especificidade do seu campo de estudo, o inconsciente, requerendo uma abordagem específica de investigação. Neste trabalho os autores propõem a utilização do estudo de caso como metodologia de investigação psicanalítica científica, através da realização de supervisão clínica e da análise da contratransferência como metodologias geradoras de evidência científica para a teoria psicanalítica.
Palavras-chave: estudo de caso, hermenêutica, métodos qualitativos, contratransferência, inconsciente.
Abstract
Case study as a methodology for psychoanalytic research
Epistemological differences regarding case study as an appropriate validationmethod of psychoanalytic theory have been observed, from a position thatunderstands psychoanalytic research as the study of meanings, and the appropriatemethod to research psychoanalytic theories; and an approach that favors theadoption of a scientific character, based on the integration of researchmethodologies supported on logics of probabilistic causal relations. Thepsychoanalytic investigation, according to causal models, does not seem to considerthe specificity of its study field, the unconscious, requiring a specific approach toresearch. In this work the authors propose the use of case study as a methodologyfor psychoanalytic scientific research, by means of clinical supervision and theanalyses of countertransference as methodologies that generate scientific evidencefor the psychoanalytic theory.
Keywords: case study, hermeneutic, qualitative methods, countertransference,unconscious.
Resumen
El estudio de caso como metodología de investigación psicoanalítica
Existen diferencias epistemológicas en relación con el estudio de caso comométodo apropiado para validar la teoría psicoanalítica, entre una posición quecomprende la investigación psicoanalítica como el estudio de los significados yel método adecuado para la investigación de las teorías psicoanalíticas y un enfoquea favor de la adopción de un carácter científico, basado en la integración demetodologías de investigación basándose en relaciones de causalidad lógicaprobabilística. La investigación psicoanalítica de acuerdo con modelos decausalidad no parece tener en cuenta la especificidad de su campo de estudio, elinconsciente, que requiere un método específico para su investigación. En estetrabajo los autores proponen el uso del estudio de caso como metodología de lainvestigación psicoanalítica científica, mediante la realización de la supervisiónclínica y el análisis de la contratransferencia como metodologías que generanevidencia científica para la teoría psicoanalítica.
Palabras clave: estudio de casos, hermenéutica, métodos cualitativos,contratransferencia, inconsciente.
Downloads
Referências
Brown, L. J. (2006). Julie's museum: The evolution of thinking, dreaming and historicization in the treatment of traumatized patients. Int. J. Psycho-anal. 87(6): 1569-1585.
Canestri, J. (2003). The logic of psychoanalytic research. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber, A. U. Drehar, & J. Canestri (Eds.). Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis (pp. 137-148).
London: International Psychoanalytical Association.
Caper, R. (1994). What is a clinical fact? Int. J. Psycho-anal. 75: 903-913.
Caper, R. (2009). Building out into the dark.Theory and observation in science and psychoanalysis. London/New York: Routledge, 2009.
Cohen, J. (1985). Trauma and repression. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 5 (1): 163-189.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oakes: Sage, 1994.
Devereux, G. (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioural sciences. The Hague: Moulton & Co., 1967.
Dreher, A. (2000). Foundations for conceptual research in psychoanalysis. London: Karnac, 2000.
Edelson, M. (1986). Causal explanation in science and in psychoanalysis - Implications for writing a case study. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child., 41: 89-127.
Elliott, H., Ryan, J., & Hollway, W. (2012). Research encounters, reflexivity and supervision. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15 (5): 433-444.
Ezriel, H. (1951). The scientific testing of psycho-analytic findings and theory. The psycho-analytic session as an experimental situation. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 24: 30-34.
Ezriel, H. (1972). Experimentation within the psychoanalytic session. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 8 (2): 229-245.
Freud, S. (1895). Studies on hysteria. In Standard Edition. (Vol. 2), London: Hogarth, 1999.
Freud, S. (1927). Postscript to “The question of lay analysis”. In Standard Edition. (Vol. 20, pp. 251-258), London: Hogarth.
Freud, S. (1938). An outline of psycho-analysis. In Standard Edition (Vol. 23, pp. 144-207), London: Hogarth Press, 1999.
Green, A. (1996). What kind of research for psychoanalysis. International Psychoanalysis 5: 8-9.
Green, A. (2000). The intrapsychic and intersubjective in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 69 (1): 1-39.
Green, A. (2003). The pluralism of sciences and psychoanalytic thinking. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber, A. U. Drehar, & J. Canestri (Eds.). Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis (pp. 26-45), London: International Psychoanalytical Association.
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis. A philosophical critique. Los Angeles/London: University of California.
Hampe, M. (2003). Pluralism of sciences and the unity of reason. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber, A. U. Drehar, & J. Canestri (Eds.). Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis (pp. 46-63), London: International Psychoanalytical Association.
Heimann, P. (1950). On counter-transference. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 31: 81-84.
Hinshelwood, R. D. (1999). Countertransference. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 80 (4): 797-818.
Hinshelwood, R. D. (2010). Psychoanalytic research: Is clinical material any use?. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 24 (4): 362-379.
Hinshelwood, R. D. (2013). Research on the couch: Single case studies, subjectivity, and psychoanalytic knowledge. East Sussex: Routledge.
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2008). The free association narrative interview method. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 296-315), Sevenoaks, California: Sage.
Kächele, H., Schachter, J., & Thoma, H. (2008). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research. New York: Psychoanalytic Inquiry.
Kubie, L. S. (1958). Research into the process of supervision in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 27: 226-236.
Kvale, S. (2001). The psychoanalytic interview as qualitative research. Psychologische Beitrage, 43 (3): 9-31.
Kvale, S. (2003). The psychoanalytical interview as inspiration for qualitative research. In P. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 275-297), Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., & Burgin, J. (2003). Pluralism and unity in psychoanalytic research: Some introductory remarks. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber, A. U. Drehar, & J. Canestri (Eds.). Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis (pp. 1-26), London: International Psychoanalytical Association.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., & Fischmann, T. (2006). Int. J. Psycho-anal., 87 (5): 1355-1386.
Levine, H. B., Reed, G. B., & Scarfone, D. (2013). Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning: Clinical and theoretical contributions. London: Karnac.
Lustman, S. L. (1963). Some issues in contemporary psychoanalytic research. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 18: 51-74.
Luyten, P., Blatt, S. J., & Corveleyn, J. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54 (2): 571-610.
Marks, S. (2001). Research project history and memory. In: M. Kiegelmann (Ed.). Qualitative research in psychology (pp. 150-154), Schwangau: Ingeborg Huber.
Marucco, N. C. (2003). O analisando de hoje e o inconsciente (sobre o conceito de zonas psíquicas). Revista de Brasileira de Psicanálise, 10 (3): 453-473.
McAloon, R. F. (1992). A historical survey of psychoanalytic research. Modern Psychoanalysis, 17 (2): 161-182.
Messer, S. B., & McCann, L. (2005). Research perspectives on the case study: Single-case method. In J. Auerbach, K. N. Levy, & C. E. Schaffer (Eds.). Relatedness, self definition and mental representation: Essays in honor of S. J. Blatt (pp. 222-237), New York: Routledge.
Midgley, N. (2006). Psychoanalysis and qualitative psychology: Complementary or contradictory paradigms? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (3): 213-231.
Popper, K. (1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation. Oxford England: Yale U. Press.
Rycroft, C. (1968). Introduction. In C. Rycroft (Ed.). Psychoanalysis Observed (pp. 7-23), New London: Constable.
Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 64 (1): 35-45.
Schafer, R. (1976). A new language for psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shakow, D. (1960). The recorded psychoanalytic interview as an objective approach to research in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly. 29: 82-97.
Stiles, W. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review. 13 (6): 593-618.
Stiles, W. B., & Shapiro, D. A. (1994). Disabuse of the drug metaphor: psychotherapy process-outcome correlations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62 (5): 942-948.
Tuckett, D. (1994). The conceptualisation and communication of clinical facts in psychoanalysis - Foreword. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 75: 865-870.
Varvin, S. (2010). Back on the track - or a new pathway? Psychotherapy of traumatized persons as a developmental process. Paper presented at IASA Conference, Cambridge, UK.
Varvin, S. (2011). Phenomena or data? Qualitative and quantitative research strategies in psychoanalysis. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 34 (2): 117-123.
Wallerstein, R. S., & Fonagy, P. (1999). Psychoanalytic research and the IPA: History, present status and future potential. Int. J. Psycho-anal., 80 (1): 91-109.
Wallerstein, R. S., & Sampson, H. (1971). Issues in research in the psychoanalytic process. Int. J. Psycho-anal. 52: 11-50.
Wolff, P. H. (1996). The irrelevance of infant observations for psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 44: 369-392.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Atribuo os direitos autorais que pertencem a mim, sobre o presente trabalho, à SPPA, que poderá utilizá-lo e publicá-lo pelos meios que julgar apropriados, inclusive na Internet ou em qualquer outro processamento de computador.
I attribute the copyrights that belong to me, on this work, to SPPA, which may use and publish it by the means it deems appropriate, including on the Internet or in any other computer processing.
Atribuyo los derechos de autor que me pertenecen, sobre este trabajo, a SPPA, que podrá utilizarlo y publicarlo por los medios que considere oportunos, incluso en Internet o en cualquier otro tratamiento informático.
