A lógica do campo

Authors

  • Howard B. Levine Médico psiquiatra. Membro do Massachusetts Institute for Psychoanalysis (MIP), do Psychoanalytic Institute of New England East (PINE), da American Psychoanalytic Association (APsaA) e da International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/sppa%20revista.v23i2.240

Keywords:

campo, Bion, Ferro, verdade, intersubjetividade, realidade psíquica, epistemologia

Abstract

O campo é um conceito que, com poucas exceções, recém chegou à psicanálise americana, sobretudo através da aplicação do trabalho de Bion, Winnicott e dos Baranger feita por Antonino Ferro (2002, 2005, 2006). A sua natureza é tal que os seus conteúdos e forma não podem ser completamente especificados. São inerentemente emergentes. Neste artigo, tentarei articular o que entendo ser o significado e o potencial valor do campo no encontro clínico, explorando a epistemologia e o estatuto de verdade do conceito de campo, bem como examinando a sua potencial função GPS em relação ao processo analítico.

Palavras-chave: campo, Bion, Ferro, verdade, intersubjetividade, realidade psíquica, epistemologia.

 

Abstract

The logic of the field

The field is a concept that, with a few exceptions, is newly arrived in Americanpsychoanalysis, mostly by way of Antonino Ferro’s (2002, 2005, 2006) applicationof the work of Bion, Winnicott and the Barangers. Its nature is such that its contentsand form cannot be fully specifiable. They are inherently emergent. In this essay,I will attempt to articulate my sense of its meaning and potential value in theclinical encounter, exploring the epistemology and truth status of the field conceptand examining its potential GPS function in relation to the analytic process.

Keywords: field, Bion, Ferro, truth, intersubjectivity, psychic reality, epistemology.

 

Resumen

La lógica del campo

El campo es un concepto que, salvo raras excepciones, recién llegó al psicoanálisisnorteamericano por medio, sobre todo, de la aplicación del trabajo de Bion,Winnicott y de los Baranger por parte de Antonino Ferro (2002, 2005, 2006). Esde tal naturaleza que sus contenidos y forma no pueden ser completamenteespecificados. Son inherentemente emergentes. En este artículo, intentaré articularlo que entiendo como el significado y el potencial valor del campo en el encuentroclínico, explorando la epistemología y el estatuto de verdad del concepto de campo,así como examinando su potencial función GPS con relación al proceso analítico.

Palabras clave: campo, Bion, Ferro, verdad, intersubjetividad, realidad psíquica,epistemología.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baranger, M. & Baranger, W. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. Int. J. of Psycho-Anal., 89: 795-826.

Baranger, W. & Baranger, M. (2009). The work of confluence. Listening and interpreting in the psychoanalytic field. Glocer-Fiorini, L. (Ed.). London: Karnac/IPA.

Bion, W. R. (1961). Experience in groups. London: Tavistock.

Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Heinemann.

Bion, W. R. (1963). Elements of Psychoanalysis. London: Heinemann.

Bion, W. R. (1967). Notes on memory and desire. In: Spillius, E., ed., Melanie Klein Today Volume 2: Mainly Practice London: Routledge, 1988, pp. 17-21.

Bion, W.R. (1973). Atenção e interpretação. Uma aproximação científica à compreensão interna na psicanálise e nos grupos. Trad. C. H. P. Affonso. Rio de Janeiro: Imago Editora.

Bion, W.R. (1992). Cogitations. London: Karnac, 1992.

Bion, W.R. (2005 [2016]). Seminários na Clínica Tavistock. Trad. Paulo Cesar Sandler. London: Karnac, 2005.

Botella, C. & Botella, S. (2005). The Work of Psychic Figurability: Mental States Without Representation. Hove, UK/New York: Brunner-Routledge.

Chetrit-Vatine, V. (2004). Primal seduction, matricial space and asymmetry in the analytic encounter. Int. J. of Psycho-Anal., 8: 841-856.

Edelman, G. (1989). The remembered present. A biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.

Ferro, A. (2002). In the analyst’s consulting room. Hove, East Sussex and New York: Brunner-Routledge.

Ferro, A. (2005). Seeds of illness, seeds of recovery. The genesis of suffering and the role of psychoanalysis. Tr. by Philip Slotkin. Hove and New York: Brunner-Routledge, 2005.

Ferro, A. (2006). Psychoanalysis as therapy and storytelling. Hove and New York: Routledge.

Freud, S. (1899). Screen memories. In S.E. III, pp. 299-322.

Freud, S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practicing psycho-analysis. In S.E 12, pp. 109-120.

Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working through. In S.E. 12, pp. 145-156.

Freud, S. (1917a). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis III. In S.E. 16, pp. 243-463.

Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. S.E. 19, pp. 109-124.

Freud, S. (1917b). Luto e melancolia. In A história do movimento psicanalítico. Artigos sobre metapsicologia e outros trabalhos. (Edição standard brasileira das obras psicológicas completas de Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14). Trad. Themira de Oliveira Brito, Paulo Henriques Britto e Christiano Monteiro Oiticica. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1974.

Freud, S. (1937). Construções em análise. In Moisés e o monoteísmo, esboço de psicanálise e outros trabalhos. (Edição standard brasileira das obras psicológicas completas de Sigmund Freud, Vol. 23, pp. 289-304). Trad. Themira de Oliveira Brito, Paulo Henriques Britto e Christiano Monteiro Oiticica. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1975.

Friedman, L. (1988). The anatomy of psychotherapy. Hillsdale, N.J.: The Analytic Press.

Grotstein, J. (2009). Psychoanalysis as a passion play. In A. Ferro & R. Basile (Ed.), The analytic field. A clinical concept (pp. 189-212). London: Karnac.

Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: the total situation. Int. J. of Psycho-Anal., 66: 447-454.

Kristeva, J. (2001). Melanie Klein. New York: Columbia University press.

Langs, R. (1976). The bipersonal field. New York: Aronson.

Levine, H. B. (2010). ‘The consolation which is drawn from truth’: The analysis of a patient unable to suffer experience. In C. Mawson (Ed.), Bion today (pp. 188-211). London: Routledge.

Levine, H. B. (2011). Construction then and now. In On Freud’s “Constructions in analysis” (pp. 87-100), S. Lewkowicz, T. Bokanowski & G. Pragier (Eds.). London: Karnac.

Levine, H. B. (2013). The colourless canvas: Repetition, therapeutic action and the creation of mind. In H. B. Levine, G. S. Reed & D. Scarfone (Eds.), Unrepresented states and the construction of meaning (pp. 42-71), London: Karnac/IPA.

Levine, H. B. (2015a). Myth. In H. B. Levine & G. Civitarese (Eds.), The W. R. Bion traditions. Lines of development – Evolution of theory and practice over the decades (pp. 307-314), London: Karnac, 2015.

Levine, H. B. (2015b). Is O necessary?. In H. B. Levine & G. Civitarese (Eds.), The W. R. Bion traditions. Lines of development – Evolution of theory and practice over the decades, London: Karnac, 2015.

Levine, H. B. (2016). The fundamental epistemological situation. Psychic reality and the limitations of classical theory. Presented as the 2016 Karl Abraham Lecture, Berlin, May, 7, 2016.

Ogden, T. (1997). Reverie and metaphor. Int. J. of Psycho-Anal., 78: 719-31.

Pirandello, L. (1998). Six characters in search of an author. Translated and Introduction by Eric Bentley. New York: Signet Classics.

Rocha Barros, E. M. & Rocha Barros, E. L. (2011). Reflections on the clinical implications of symbolism. Int. J. of Psycho-Anal., 92: 879-901.

Roussillon, R. (2011). Primitive agonies and symbolization. London: Karnac/IPA.

Scarfone, D. (2006). A matter of time: Actual time and the production of the past. Psychoanal. Quart. 75: 807-834.

Scarfone, D. (2015). Laplanche. New York: The Unconscious in Translation.

Sechaud, E. (2008). The handling of the transference in French psychoanalysis. Int. J. of Psycho-Anal., 89: 1011-1028.

Stern, D.B. (2013a). Field Theory in Psychoanalysis, Part I: Harry Stack Sullivan and Madeleine and Willy Baranger. Psychoanal. Dial., 23:487-501.

Stern, D.B. (2013b). Field Theory in Psychoanalysis, Part 2: Bionian Field Theory and Contemporary Interpersonal/Relational Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dial., 23:630-645.

Winnicott, D.W. (1971). Therapeutic consultations in child psychiatry. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

Published

2016-08-30

How to Cite

Levine, H. B. (2016). A lógica do campo. SPPA Journal of Psychoanalysis, 23(2), 255. https://doi.org/10.5281/sppa revista.v23i2.240