CONCEITOS E PERSPECTIVAS DA AVALIAÇÃO DA TERAPIA PSICANALÍTICA
Palavras-chave:
Terapia psicanalítica, Neurose, Personalidade borderlineResumo
A pesquisa em psicoterapia psicanalítica é hoje, como antes, uma enteada; o número daqueles que com ela se ocupam de
forma séria não é muito grande. Ela está ligada a instituições científicas, pois somente nelas existe a infra estrutura necessária
para sua realização. Seus pontos fortes estão hoje tanto na avaliação geral de formas de terapia psicanalítica, como na análise
microprocessual dos conceitos centrais da terapia psicanalítica. Uma separação rígida da Psicanálise standard dos outros
procedimentos terapêuticos dela derivados não é, até hoje, defensável; a variação existente no seio daquilo que se batizou
como psicanalítico, multiplicado pela muito grande variedade do fazer psicanalítico ligado aquele que o exerce, origina uma
variabilidade que, somente de forma artificial, se deixa classificar em categorias rígidas. Seria de grande ajuda identificar
dimensões essenciais do fazer terapêutico psicanalítico e descobrir para cada paciente que mistura e que dose é necessária
para ele. Cada psicanalista é hoje, como no passado, chamado, através de cuidadosos estudos de caso, a colaborar para que
possa comprovar o seu fazer. Assim, não é necessária nenhuma preocupação em relação a terapia destruir a ciência pois,
então, como anteriormente, cada um dos estudos de caso poderá contribuir para o crescimento do conhecimento psicanalítico
Abstract
Research on psychoanalytical therapy is, today as well as earlier, astep child; very few are those who are working on it seriously.
This kind of research is linked to scientific institutions because only there it is possible to find the infrastructure to support it. The
strong topic of such research is today the general evaluation of ali forms of psychoanalytical therapy as well as in the micro
processual analysis of its central concepts. It is not possible any longer to agree to a rigid distinction between the standard
Psychoanalysis and other therapeutic forms derived from it; the great variation existing regarding what was called
psychoanalytical, multiplied by the great variability of the psychoanalytical practice of the therapists produces a variability, which
only artificially can be classified finto rigid categories. It would be helpful to identify essential dimensions of the therapeutic
psychoanalytical practice and to discover for each patient what mix and doses is necessary for him. Every psychoanalyst is
called, today as earlier, to collaborate to test his practice through careful case studies. Doing so, it would not be necessary to
worry about therapy destroying science because each of lhe case studies could add to the growth of psychoanalytic knowledge.
Downloads
Referências
ALEXANDER, F. (1937b). Five year report of the Chicago Institute of Psychoanalysis. Chicago: Institute for Psychoanalysis, 1932
ANONYMOUS (1988). The spcecimen hour. In: Dahl H., Kächele H., Thomä H, (Eds) Psychoanalytic Process Research
Strategies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo: S 15 28.
BACHRACH, H.M.; WEBER, J.J.; MURRAY, S. (1985). Factors associated with the outcome of psychoanalysis. Report of the
Columbia Psychoanalytic Center Research Project (IV). Int. Rev. Psychoanal. 12: 379 389.
BECKMANN, D. (1974). Der Analitiker und sein Patient. Untersuchungen zur übertragung und Gegenübertragung. Huber, Bern
Suttgart Wien.
_____ (1978). übertragungsforschung. In: Pongratz L.J. (Hrsg) Handbuch der Psychologie. Klinische Psychologie. (8/2, Bd
Verlag für Psychologie, Göttingen: S 1242 1256.
_____ (1988). Aktionsforschungen zur Gegenübertragung. Rückblick auf ein Forschungsprogramm. In: Kutter, P.; Raramo Ortega,
R.; Zagermann, R (Hrsg) Die psychoanalytische Haltung, München: Verlag Inernacionale Psychoanalyse, S 231 244.
BERGIN, A. (1971). The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. In: Bergin, A.; Garfield, S. (Eds) Handbook of Psychotherapy and
Behavior Change. New York: Wiley, S 217 270.
BIBR ING, E. (1937). Versuch einer allgemeinen Theorie der Heilung. Int. Z. PsychoanaL 23:1842.
BOEHM, F. (1942). Erhebung und Bearbeitung von Katamnensen. Zbl Psychoter. 14: 17 24.
BRäUTIGAM, W.; RAD, M. VON; ENGEL, K. (1980). Erfolgs und Therapieforschung bei psychoanalytischen Behandlungen. Z
Psychosom Med. Psychoanal. 26: 101 118.
DAHL, H. (1988). Frames of mind. In: Dahl H., Kächele H., Thomä H, (Eds) Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies.
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo: S 51 66.
_____ (1991). The key to understanding change: Emotions as appetitive wishes and beliefs about their fulfilment. In: Safran, J.;
Greenberg, L. (Eds) Emotions, Psychotherapy and Change. New York: Guilford.
DAHL, H.; HöLZER, M.; BERRY, J. (1992). How to identify emotions. Ulmer Textbank. Um.
DAHL, H.; TELLER, V. (1993). Characteristics and identification of frames. In: Miller, N.; Docherty, J., Luborsky, L. (Eds)
Psychodinamic treatment research. New York: Basis Books, in press.
DAHLBENDER, R.; ALBANI, C.; POKORNY, D.; Kächele H. (1993). Central relationship patterns a structural version of the Core
Conflictual relationship patters. Psychotherapy Research, in press.
DüHRSSEN, A. (1972). Analytische Psychotherapie in Theorie, Praxis und Ergebnissen. Göttingen: Vandenhock & Ruprecht.
_____ (1962). Katamnestische Ergebnisse bei 1004 Patienten nach analytischer Psychotherapie. Z. Psychosom. Med. 8: 94 113.
DüHRSSEN, A.M.; JORSWIECK,E. (1965). Eine empirisch statistische Untersuchung zur Leistungsfahigkeit psychoanalytiker
Behandlung. Nervenarzt. 36: 166 169.
EDELSON, M. (1985). The hermeneutic turn and the single case study in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought 8: 567
EYSENCK, H. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: an evaluation. J. Consulting Psychology 16: 319 324.
FELDMANN, F. (1968). Results of psychoanalysis
FENICHEL, O. (1939). Statistischer Bericht über die therapeutische Tätigkeit 1920 1930. In: Radó, S.; Fenichel, O.; Müller
Braunschweig C (Hrsg) Zehn Jahre Berliner Psychoanytisches Institut, Pofikiin und Lehranstalt. Wien: Int. Psychoanal. Verlag, S
FISCHER, G. (1990). Widerspruch und Veränderung ein dialektisches Modell der Veränderung im psychoanalytischen Prozess.
FLADER, D.; GRODZICKI W.D., SCHRöTER, K. (Hrsg) (1982). Psychoanalyse als Gespräch. lnteraktionsanalytische
Untersuchungen über Therapie und Supervision. Frankfurtam Mäin: Suhrkamp.
FREUD, S. (1933a). Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einfuhrung in die Psychoanalyse, GW Bd 15.
GILL, M.M., HOFFMAN, IZ. (1982a) Analysis of transference. Vol. II: Studies of nine audiorecorded psychoanalytic sessions. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
_____ (1982b). A method for studing the analysis of aspects of patient's experience in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. J. Am.
Psychoanal Assoc. 30: 137 167.
GRAFF, H.; LUBORSKY, L. (1977). ,Long term trends in transference and resistance: A quantitative analytic method applied to
four psychoanalyses. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc. 25: 471 490.
HEROLD, R. (1990). Bezíehungserfahrungín Psychoanalysen: BIP einManuaI zur Erfassung von überiragungsphãnomenen im
psychoanalytischen Prozess, unpubl. Manuskript. Tübingen.
HOHAGE, R.; KüBLER, J.C. (1988). The emotional insight rating scale. In: Dahl H., Kächele H., Thomä H, (Eds) Psychoanalytic
Process Research Strategies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo: S 243 255.
HöLZER, M.; HECKMANN, H., ROBBEN, H., KäCHELE, H. (1988). Die freis Assoziation ais Funktion der habituellen ängstiichkeit
und anderer Variablen. Zsch Klin PsychoL 17:148161.
HöLZER, M.; SCHEYTT, N.; KäCHELE, H. (1992). Das "Affektive Dikytionär Ulm" ais sins Methode der quantitativen
Vokabularbestimmung. In: Züll C. Mohler P. Inhaltsanalyse. Beiträge zull. TEXTPACK Anwenderkonferenz. Opladen:
Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, S 131 154.
HOROWITZ, M.J. (1979). States of mind: Analysis of change in psychotherapy. New York, London.
JONES, E. (1936). Report of the Clinic Work: 1926 1936. London Clinic of Psychoanalysis, 1936.
JONES, E.E.; WINDHOLZ, M. (1990). The psychoanalytic case study: Toward a method for systematic inquiry. J. Am. Psychoanal.
Assoc. 38: 985 1016.
KäCHELE, H. (1988). Clinicai and scientic aspects of the Ulm process model of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal69: 65 73.
_____ (1990). Welche Methoden für welche Fragen? Schriften des Sigmund Freud Institutes 10: 73 89.
KACHELE, H.; DENGLER, D.; ECKERT, R, S.S. (1990). Veränderung des zentralen Beziehungskonflikes durch sins Kurztherapie.
Psychoter med Psychol 40: 178 185.
KäCHELE, H.; EHLERS, W. & HöLZER, M. (1991). Experiment und Epirire in der Psychoanalyse. In: Scheneider, F., Bartels, M. &
Gaertner, H.J. (Hrsg) Perspektiven der Psychiatrie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
KäCHELE, H. MERGENTHALER, E. (1983). Computer/aided analysis of psychotherapeutic discourse. In: Minsel, R.; Herff, W.
(Hrsg) Methodology in Psychotherapy Research. Proceedings of the 1 st European Conferenceon Psychotherapy Research, Vol.
Frankfurt: Peter Lang, S 116 161.
KAPLAN, F. (1966). Anxiety and defense in a therapy like situation. J. Abnorm. PsychoL 71: 449 458.
KERNBERG, O. Foreword: The clinical view. In: Luborsky, L.; Crits Christoph, P.; Mintz, J.; Auerbach,A. (Eds) Mo will benefit from
Psychotherapy: Predicting therapeutic out comes. New York: Basic Books, S XI XV.
KERNBERG, O.F., BURTEINE, E.D.; COYNE, L. APPELBAUM, A.; HORWITZ, L.;VOTH, H. (1972). Psychotherapy and
psyhoanalysis. Final report of the Menninger Foundation. Buli Menn Clin 36: 3 275.
KERNBERG, O.F., SELZER, M.A., KOENIGSBERG, H.W.; CARR, A.C.; APPELBAUM, A.H.; (1989). Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
of Borderline Patients. New York: Basic Books.
KLINE, P. (1981). Fact and Phantasy in Freudian Theory. London: Methuen.
KNAP, P.; LEVIN, S.; MC CARTER, R, WERNER, H., ZETZEL, E. (1960). Suitability for psychoanalysis: A review of 100
supervisied cases Psychoanal. Quart 29: 459 477.
KNIGHT, R.P. (1941). Evaluation of the results os psychoanalytic therapy. Am. J. Psychiatry 98: 434/446.
KORDY, H.; RAD, M. VON; SENF, W. (1983). Success and failure in psychotherapy: Hypotheses and results form lhe Heidelberg
follow up project. Psychother. Psychosom. 40:211 227.
_____ (1985) Time and its relevance for a successful psychotherapy. Psychother. Psychosom. 49: 212 222.
KORDY, H.; SENF, W. (1985). Oberlegungen zur Evaluation psychotherapeutischer Be handlungen. Psychother. Med. Psychol.
:207 212.
KRAUSE, R. (1988). Eine Taxonomie der Affekte und ihre Anwendung auf das Verstãndnis der 'frühen'' Störungen. 38: 77 86
Psychother. Med. PsychoL
KRAUSE, R., LüTOLF, P. (1988). Facial indicators of transference processes within psychoanalytic treatment. In: Dahl H., Kãchele
H., Thomä H, (Eds) Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo: S
256.
LEUZINGER BOHLEBER, M. (1987). Veränderung kognitiver Prozesse in Psychoanalysen. Bd 1: Eine hipothesengenerierende
Einzelfallstudie. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.
_____ (1989). Veränderung kognitiver Prozesse in Psychoanalysen. Bd 2: Eine gruppen statistische Untersuchung. Berlin,
Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.
LEUZINGER BOHLEBER, M., KäCHELE, H. (1990). Von Calvin zu Freud: Artificial Intelligence Modelle ais theoretische Basis bei
einer inhaltsanalytischen Untersuchung der Verãnderung kognitiver Prozesse in Psychoanalysen. Z. Clin. Psychol. 19: 111 122.
_____ (1988). From Calvin to Freud: Using an artificial intelligence model to investigate cognitive changes during
psychoanalysis. In: Dahl H., Kãchele H., Thomã H, (Eds) Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Berlin, Heidelberg, New
York, London, Paris, Tokyo: Springer, S 291 306.
LUBORSKY, L. (1962). Clinicians, judgments of mental health: A proposed scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 7: 407 417.
_____ (1969). Research cannot yet influence practice. Int. J. Psychiatry7: 135 140.
_____ (1975). Clinician's judgements of mental health: specimen case descriptions and forms for the Health Sickness Rating
Scale. Bull Menn Clin 3: 448 480.
_____ ( 1984). Principles of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. A manual for supportive expressive treatment. New York: Basic
Books.
LUBORSKY, L.; CHANDLER, M.; AUERBACH, A.H.; COHEN, J.; BACHRACH, H.M. (1971). Factors influencing the outcome of
psychotherapy; a review of qualitative research. Psychol Bull.75: 145 185. Conceitos e Perspectivas da Avaliação da Terapia
Psicanalítica
LUBORSKY, L.; CRITS CHRISTOPH, P. (1990). Understanding transference. New York: Basic Books.
LUBORSKY, L.; CRITS CHRISTOPH, P., ALEXANDER, L.; MARGOLIS, M.; COHEN, M.; (1983). Two helping alliance methods for
predicting outcomes of psychotherapy: a counting signs versus a global rating method. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 171: 480 492.
LUBORSKY, L.; CRITS CHRISTOPH, P.; MINTZ, J.; AUERBACH, A. (1988). Who will benefit from Psychotherapy? New York: Basic
Books.
LUBORSKY, L.; KäCHELE, H. (Hrg) (1988). Der zentrale Beziehungskonflikt. Ulm: PSZ Verlag.
LUBORSKY, L.; SHIMECK, J. (1964). Psychoanalytic theories of therapeutic and developmental change implications for
assessment. In: Worchel, P.; Byrne, D. (Eds) Personality change. New York: Wiley.
MERGENTHALER, E.; KäCHELE, H. (1988). The Ulm Textbank management system: A tool for psychotherapy research. In: Dahl
H., Kächele H., Thomä H, (Eds) Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London,
Paris, Tokyo: S 195 212.
MEYER, A.; (1962). Der psychoanalytische Dialog: seine methodischen Determinanten und seine grundsätzlichen Möglichkeiten
zur Verifizierung und Validisierung psychoanalytischer Thesen. Med. Welt 47: 2439 2445.
_____ (1990). Psychoanalytische Forschung für das Ende des Jahrhunderts. In: Sigmund Freud Institut (Hrsg) Empirische Forschung in der Psychoanalyse. (10, Bd Sigmund Freud Institut, Frankfurt: S 8 26.
MEYER, A.E. (ed) (1981b). the Hamburg short psychotherapy comparision experiment. Psychoter. Psychosom. 35: 77 220.
_____ (1988). What makes psychoanalysts tick? In: Dahl H., Kächele H., Thomä H, (Eds) Psychoanalytic Process Research
Strategies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo: S 273 290.
MOSER, U. (1992). On line and Off line, practice and research: A balance. In: Leuzinger Bohleber, M.; Schneider, H.; Pfeifer, R.
(Hrsg) "Two butterflies on my head..." Psychoanalysis in the interdisciplinary dialogue. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, S
196.
MOSER, U.; ZEPPELIN, I VON (1991). Kognitive Affektive Prozesse. Berlin, Heidelberg, New ' York: Springer.
MOSER, U.; ZEPPELIN, I VON; SCHNEIDER, W. (1970). Computer simulation of a model of neurotic defense processes.
Technical paper. Beh Sci. Behavioral Sciences,15:194 202.
NEUDERT, L.; GRüNZIG, H.J., THöMA, H. (1987). Change in self esteem durins psychoanalysis: a single case study. In:
Chesshire, N.M.; Thomä H. (Eds) Self, symptoms and psychotherapy. New York, Chichester: Wiley & Sons, S 243 265.
NEUDERT, L.; HOHAGE, R. (1988). Different types of suffering during a psychoanalysis. In: Dahl H., Kächele H., Thomä H, (Eds)
Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo: S 227 242.
NUNBERG, H. (1954). Evaluation of th results of psychoanalytic treatment. Int. J. Psychoanal. 35: 2 7.
OBERNDORF, C. (1953). Results to be effected with psychoanalysis. AMA Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 69: 655.
RANGELL, L. (1981). Psychoanalysis and dynamic psychotherapy. Similarities and differences twenty five years later.
Psychoanal. Q 50: 665 693.
SASCHIN, J. L; ELDRED, S.H.; AMERONGEN, S.T. VAN (1975). A search for predictive factors in institute supervised cases. A
retrospective study of 183 cases from 1959 1966 at the Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute. Int. J. PsychoanaL 56: 343
SCHACHT, T.E.; BINDER, J.L, STRUPP, H.H. (1984). The dynamic focus. In: Strupp, H.H.; Binder, J.L. (Eds) Psychotherapy in a
new key: a guide to time limited dynamic psychotherapy. New York: Basic Book, S 65 109.
SCHJELDRUP, H. (1955). Lasting effects of psychoanalytic treatments. Psychiatry 18: 109133.
SCHULLER, R.; CRITS CHRISTOPH, P.; CONNOLLY, M. (1991). The resistance scale: Background and psychometric properties.
Psychoanalytic Psychology 8: 195 211.
SHAKOW, D. (1960). The recorded psychoanalytic interview as an objective approach to research in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal
Q 29: 82 97.
SHAPIRO, D. (1990). Lesson in history: three generations of therapy research. Paper delivered at the 21 st Annual Meeting of the
Society for Psychotherapy Research, Wintergreen/USA.
SILBERSCHATZ, G.; CURTIS, J.T (1986). Clinical implications of research on brief dynamic psychotherapy. II How the therapist
helps or hinders therapeutic process. Psychoanaly. Psychol. 3: 27 37.
SIMMEL, E. (1930). Zur Geschichte und sozialen Bedeutung des Berliner Psychoanalytischen Institutes. In: DPG 10 Jahre
Berliner Psychoanalytisches Institut.
SLAP, J.; SLAYKIN, A. (1983). The schema: basic concept in a nonmetapsychological model of mind. Psychoanal. Contemp.
Thought 6: 305 325.
SLOANE, E.R.B.; STAPLES, FR.; CRISTOL, A.H.; YORKSTON, N.J.; WHIPPLE, K. (1975). Psychotherapy versus behavior therapy.
Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
SPENCE, D.P. (1982a). Narrative truth and historical truth. Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York: Norton.
STEIMER KRAUSE, E. (1991). übertragung bei schizophrenen Patienten Wiederholung von non verbalen lnteraktions mustern,
mit spezifisch qualitativen und temporalen Charakteristika. Vortrag auf der 14. Ulmer Werkstatt.
TELLER, V.; DAHL, H. (1986). The microstructure of free association. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc. 34: 763 798.
THOMä, H.; KäCHELE, H. (1975). Problems of metascience and methodology in clinicai psychoanalytic research. Annu.
Psychoanal. III: 49 119.
_____ (1985). Lehrbuch der Psychoanalytischen Therapie. Bd 1: Grundlagen. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer,
portuguese (1991).
WALLERSTEIN, R. (1990). Zum Verhätnis von Psychoanalyse und Psychotherapie. Wiederaufnahme einer Diskussion. Psyche
: 967 994.
WALLERSTEIN, R.; ROBBINS, L.; SARGENT, H.; LUBORSKY, L. (1956). The Psychotherapy Research Project of The Menninger
Foundation: Rationale, Method and Sample Use. First Report. Buli Menninger Clinic 20: 221 278.
WALLERSTEIN, R. S. (1986). Forty two lifes in treatment. A study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
WALLERSTEIN, R. S.; SAMPSON, H. (1971). Issues in research in psychoanalytic process. Int. J. Psychoanal. 52: 11 50.
WEISS, J.; SAMPSON, H.; Group at MZPR (1986). The psychoanalytíc process: theory, clinicai observation, and empirical
research. New York: Guilford Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Atribuo os direitos autorais que pertencem a mim, sobre o presente trabalho, à SPPA, que poderá utilizá-lo e publicá-lo pelos meios que julgar apropriados, inclusive na Internet ou em qualquer outro processamento de computador.
I attribute the copyrights that belong to me, on this work, to SPPA, which may use and publish it by the means it deems appropriate, including on the Internet or in any other computer processing.
Atribuyo los derechos de autor que me pertenecen, sobre este trabajo, a SPPA, que podrá utilizarlo y publicarlo por los medios que considere oportunos, incluso en Internet o en cualquier otro tratamiento informático.
