Sobre a amorfia (formlessness) em Winnicott e seu papel na simbolização

Autores

  • Jan Abram British Psychoanalytical Society (BPaS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/sppa%20revista.v20i3.112

Palavras-chave:

amorfia, desenvolvimento psíquico inicial, pensamento simbólico, integrado paterno, dinâmica triádica, André Green, Winnicott, Formlessness, Simbolização

Resumo

Este ensaio examina o último trabalho de Winnicott no qual ele enfoca os estágios iniciais do desenvolvimento psíquico. Amorfia, relacionada ao conceito anterior de Winnicott de não integração, é um precursor necessário para a integração e o pensamento simbólico. Assim, o sujeito poderia ir da relação com o objeto para o uso do objeto. No derradeiro trabalho de Winnicott ele sugere a noção do pai como objeto inteiro no início. Aqui vou propor a noção de integrado paterno, vinculada ao conceito de o outro do objeto de André Green. Concluo que a noção de Winnicott do pai como objeto inteiro desde o início da vida completa sua matriz teórica, uma vez que inclui a noção de uma dinâmica triádica no estágio mais inicial da vida psíquica.

On Winnicott’s area of formlessness and its role in symbolization

This essay examines Winnicott’s late work in which he focuses on the earliest stages of psychic development. Formlessness, related to Winnicott’s earlier concept of unintegration, is a necessary precursor to integration and symbolic thinking. Thus the subject could move from object relating to object usage. In Winnicott’s very late work he suggests the notion of the father as a whole object at the beginning. Here, I will propose the notion of a paternal integrate linked with André Green’s concept of the other of the object. I conclude that Winnicott’s notion of the father as whole object from the beginning of life completes his theoretical matrix because it includes the notion of a triadic dynamic at the earliest stage of psychic life.

Keywords: formlessness, early psychic development, symbolic thinking, paternal integrate, triadic dynamic, André Green, Winnicott, formlessness, symbolization.


 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abram, J. (2007a). The language of Winnicott: a dictionary of Winnicott’s use of words. London: Karnac.

_____. (2007b). L’objet qui ne survit pas: Quelques réflexions sur les racines de la terreur. Journal de la psychanalyse de l’enfant, 39, 247-70.

_____. (2012a). On not being able to paint (1950) and The hands of the living god (1969). The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93 (5), 1340-47.

_____. (2012b) On Winnicott’s clinical innovations in the analysis of adults The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93 (6), 1461-73

_____. (2012c). De la communication et de la non-communication : la cherche pour un objet qui survivra. Revue Belge de Psychanalyse.

_____. (2012d) D. W. W.’s notes for the Vienna Congress 1971: a consideration of Winnicott’s theory of aggression and an interpretation of the clinical implications In J. Abram (Ed.) Donald Winnicott today: The new library of psychoanalysis (pp. 302-330). London: Routledge, 2013.

_____. (2013a) (Ed.) Donald Winnicott today: The new library of psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.

Green, A. (1972) Note sur les processus tertiaires. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 36 (3), 407-410.

_____ (1991) On thirdness In J. Abram (Ed.) André Green at the Squiggle Foundation (pp. 39-68). London; New York: Karnac, 2000.

Winnicott, D. W. (1945). Primitive emotional development. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26, 137–43.

_____. (1955). Metapsychological and clinical aspects of regression within the psychoanalytical set-up. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 36, 16-26.

_____. (1958a). Primary maternal preoccupation [1956]. In _____. Through pediatrics to Psicho-Analysis (Collected papers, pp. 300-305). London: Tavistock.

_____. (1958b) Through pediatrics to Psicho-Analysis (Collected papers). London: Tavistock.

_____. (1965a) Ego integration in child development (1962). In _____. Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 56-63). London: Hogarth, 1969.

_____. (1965b). Providing for the child in health and crisis [1962]. In _____. Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 64-72). London: Hogarth, 1969.

_____. (1965c) The aims of psycho-analytical treatment. In _____. Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 166-70). London: Hogarth, 1969.

_____. (1967). Mirror-role of mother and family in child development. In _____. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.

_____. (1969). The use of an object and relating through identifications. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50, 711-716.

_____. (1971a). O brincar e a realidade. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1975.

_____. (1971b). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.

_____. (1971c). Dreaming, fantasying and living: A case history describing a primary dissociation [1970]. In _____. Playing and reality (pp. 26-37). London: Tavistock.

_____. (1971d). Creativity and its origins [1970]. In _____. Playing and reality (pp. 65-85). London: Tavistock.

_____. (1971e). The split-off male and female elements to be found in men and women [1966]. In _____. Playing and reality (pp. 72-85). London: Tavistock.72–85.

_____. (1971f) Interrelating in terms of cross identifications. In _____. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.

_____. (1971g). Playing: creative activity and the search for the self [1970]. In _____. Playing and reality (pp. 53-64). London: Tavistock.

_____. (1988). Human nature. London: Free Association Books.

_____. (1989). The use of an object in the context of Moses and Monotheism [1969]. In J. Abram. The language of Winnicott: a dictionary of Winnicott’s use of words. London: Karnac, 2007.

Publicado

12-12-2013

Como Citar

Abram, J. (2013). Sobre a amorfia (formlessness) em Winnicott e seu papel na simbolização. Revista De Psicanálise Da SPPA, 20(3), 553. https://doi.org/10.5281/sppa revista.v20i3.112